Self-Diagnosis: Separating Clinical Reality from Social Media Trends

Key Points

• Diagnoses have risen dramatically, but underlying symptoms may not have: A 2025 Swedish study of 9 birth cohorts found autism diagnoses increased substantially, but parent-reported autism symptoms did not increase proportionally, suggesting diagnostic expansion rather than a true increase in the condition itself.
• TikTok and social media enable rapid self-diagnosis with high error rates: Research shows 80% of mental health content on social media can be misleading, and people are 5–11 times more likely to incorrectly self-diagnose than to correctly identify a condition.
• Real mental health crises are happening alongside diagnostic expansion: U.S. depression prevalence nearly doubled from 8.2% (2013 – 2014) to 13.1% (2021 – 2023); ER visits for youth mental health emergencies doubled between 2011–2020; and rates among 16 – 24-year-olds are significantly higher than older adults.
• Broadened diagnostic criteria and increased awareness account for much of the rise: Changes in DSM-5 (e.g., integrating Asperger’s into autism spectrum disorder), greater public awareness, and the need for formal diagnoses to access school/workplace accommodations have expanded who gets diagnosed without necessarily adding more sick people.
• Many conditions were historically under-diagnosed in girls, women, and minorities: ADHD recognition in girls is rising partly due to better identification of how the condition presents differently; autism in adults is being recognized for the first time in many people who masked symptoms for decades.
• Professional assessment is essential, not TikTok videos or online quizzes: A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation requires trained clinicians, multi-source information (family history, school records, symptom observation), and ruling out other causes; no app or video can replicate this.

The Rise in Diagnoses: What the Data Shows (2023–2025)

The numbers are striking. In the United States, the percentage of adolescents and adults with depression in the past 2 weeks rose from 8.2% in 2013 – 2014 to 13.1% by August 2021 – August 2023; a 60% increase in less than a decade. ADHD screening rates among English adults climbed from 8.2% in 2007 to 13.9% in 2023 – 24.

Autism diagnoses have risen even more dramatically: prevalence estimates have increased 3 – 5 fold globally since the 1990s.

These trends are real and they are substantial. But what do they actually mean? Are we suddenly living in an era where far more people have these conditions? Or are we better at spotting them? Or both?

The Symptom-Diagnosis Gap: A Key Finding

A landmark 2025 Swedish study examined nine consecutive birth cohorts and asked a critical question: As diagnoses of autism and ADHD rose, did the underlying symptoms in the general population also rise? The findings were striking: while clinical diagnoses of autism increased substantially, parent-reported autism symptoms in the general population did not increase proportionally. For ADHD, symptoms in boys remained stable, and only a small increase was observed in girls, far too small to explain the surge in diagnoses.

This suggests that the rise in diagnoses is driven less by an actual increase in symptoms and more by other factors: broader diagnostic criteria, increased awareness, changed perception of what counts as impairing, and financial incentives for diagnosis (e.g., access to accommodations, special education funding, or disability benefits).

However, this does not mean diagnoses are “wrong.” It means the diagnostic net has widened to include people who might not have been identified in earlier decades which can be both positive (catching people who need help) and challenging (potentially labeling normal variation as disorder).

What Is Actually Driving the Diagnostic Rise?

Experts point to several interconnected factors that explain the increase in diagnoses without invoking a sudden plague of new mental illness:

1. Expanded Diagnostic Criteria

In 2013, the DSM-5 (the diagnostic bible for psychiatry) integrated Asperger’s syndrome into autism spectrum disorder (ASD), broadening who could receive an autism diagnosis. Similarly, diagnostic criteria for ADHD have been refined to better capture how the condition presents in different groups, especially girls and adults. These changes are scientifically justified, they improve accuracy but they also increase the number of people who technically meet criteria.

2. Better Recognition of Historically Missed Groups

For decades, ADHD and autism were under-diagnosed in girls, women, and racial minorities, largely because symptoms present differently and because diagnostic bias favored identifying conditions in boys. A girl with ADHD might be “quiet and dreamy” rather than hyperactive; a woman with autism might be socially skilled at “masking” her difficulties. As awareness has improved, these groups are finally being identified.

3. Genuine Increase in Mental Health Distress

Alongside diagnostic expansion, there is solid evidence of a real increase in depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation, particularly among young people. U.S. emergency room visits for youth mental health crises nearly doubled from 2011 to 2020. Rates of depression among adolescents and young adults (16 – 24 years) have climbed significantly in recent years. This appears driven by genuine societal stressors: social media use, economic precarity, climate anxiety, pandemic effects, and competitive educational/employment environments.

4. Incentives for Diagnosis

A child diagnosed with ADHD or autism gains access to special education services, accommodations, and sometimes medication; a student with an anxiety diagnosis may qualify for test accommodations or campus support. While these supports are essential for those who truly need them, they can create a subtle incentive to seek diagnosis even when symptoms are mild or ambiguous. Similarly, some disability benefit programs reimburse high-cost treatments (like ABA therapy for autism) in ways that can incentivize broader diagnosis.

5. “Medicalization” of Normal Distress

There is legitimate concern that normal childhood energy, shyness, sadness, or adjustment to stressful life events are sometimes labeled as ADHD, anxiety, or depression rather than addressed through environmental change, parenting approaches, or natural development. A child struggling with a chaotic home, poor sleep, or lack of physical activity might benefit more from addressing those factors than from a diagnosis and medication.

The Social Media Self-Diagnosis Trap: Why TikTok Diagnoses Are Dangerous

One of the most troubling trends is the rise of self-diagnosis through social media, particularly TikTok. Young people scroll through videos of others describing their ADHD, autism, OCD, anxiety, or dissociative identity disorder, find the descriptions relatable, and conclude they have the same condition. The problem is substantial and well-documented.

The Numbers Are Alarming

Research finds that approximately 80% of mental health content on TikTok can be misleading. Studies show that people are 5 – 11 times more likely to incorrectly self-diagnose than to correctly identify a mental health condition based on social media content. One research study on TikTok users found strong positive correlations between perceiving videos as “reliable” and using TikTok to self-diagnose users trusted the platform enough to diagnose themselves with conditions presented in short videos.

Why This Is Risky

Relatability is not diagnosis: Many mental health symptoms overlap. Feeling anxious, having trouble focusing, or struggling socially can reflect anxiety disorder, ADHD, autism, depression, situational stress, sleep deprivation, or normal development. A 2 – 3 minute TikTok video cannot differentiate between these possibilities. A professional assessment requires hours of conversation, history-taking, observation, and often input from family, teachers, or others who know the person.

Misdiagnosis leads to wrong treatments: Someone who self-diagnoses with anxiety and starts avoiding situations (reassurance-seeking), or self-diagnoses with autism and stops pursuing social goals they actually want, may be harmed rather than helped. Someone who thinks they have ADHD and self-medicates with stimulants (or seeks them inappropriately) faces real health risks.

Identity and community effects: Claiming a diagnosis (especially rare ones like dissociative identity disorder or OCD) can become part of online identity and community belonging. Research has documented how creators who self-diagnose with rare disorders like DID have inadvertently glamourized those conditions, leading other vulnerable users to seek the same diagnosis for social validation and harming people who actually have the disorder and face stigma or trivialization as a result.

Delayed or avoided professional help: Someone who self-diagnoses through TikTok may skip the professional evaluation, missing the chance for comprehensive assessment that might reveal a different condition or underlying factor (depression, trauma, medical illness) that is actually driving their symptoms.

How Misinformation Spreads

Mental health content creators on TikTok are often not mental health professionals. They may share relatable personal experiences, but without the training to discuss nuance, differential diagnosis, or the limits of self-awareness. Algorithms amplify content that gets engagement and mental health videos, especially dramatic or relatable ones, get engagement. The result is a flood of content that feels authoritative but lacks clinical grounding.

Self-Diagnosis vs. Professional Assessment

What this table shows: Self-diagnosis through social media is fast, intuitive, and feels accurate because symptoms overlap. But professional assessment is thorough, considers alternatives, and results in a diagnosis that actually guides treatment rather than just confirming what you thought you had.

Yes, Real Mental Health Distress Is Also Rising; This Is Not Either/Or

While diagnostic expansion and social media self-diagnosis are real concerns, it would be wrong to dismiss the entire rise as over-pathologization. There is clear evidence that genuine mental health crises are increasing, especially among young people.

The Evidence of Real Increases

Depression and anxiety are genuinely more common: U.S. prevalence of depression nearly doubled from 8.2% to 13.1% between 2013-2014 and 2021-2023. In England, prevalence of common mental health problems rose from 17.6% in 2007 to 22.6% in 2023–24. These are population-level increases, not just diagnostic label shifts. Young people (16-24 years) show rates of 25.8%, up from 17.5% in 2007.

ER visits for mental health crises in youth nearly doubled: Emergency department visits for mental health reasons among adolescents and young adults nearly doubled from 2011 to 2020, reflecting acute distress severe enough to warrant emergency care. This is not a diagnostic expansion, it is real suffering.

Self-harm rates are rising sharply: Hospital admission rates for self-harm in 10-24-year-olds are significantly higher than for older adults, with young women showing rates of 433 per 100,000 in 2023-24; nearly 3 times higher than adult women. This is concrete evidence of distress, not just labels.

Why the Genuine Increase?

The causes likely include social media’s impact on self-esteem and social comparison, economic uncertainty and precarity for young adults, pandemic disruption and lasting effects on socialization, climate anxiety and sense of future threat, competitive academic and employment environments, reduced physical activity and outdoor time, and increased screen time replacing face-to-face connection. These are real societal stressors that are producing real distress, separate from the question of whether we are now labeling normal distress as disorder.

The Other Side: Under-Diagnosis and Missed Cases Still Happen

While there are legitimate concerns about over-diagnosis, it is crucial to acknowledge that under-diagnosis is still a major problem for specific groups.

Girls and women remain under-identified for ADHD and autism: Historically, ADHD was diagnosed far more often in boys than girls, and autism was also male-biased. Research now shows that girls often mask or internalize symptoms differently (appearing quiet or anxious rather than hyperactive; managing socially through scripting and effort), causing them to be missed entirely. Many women do not receive diagnosis until adulthood, if at all, losing years of support and understanding. The increase in diagnoses among girls and women is largely positive, it is recognition of a previously hidden problem.

Racial and ethnic minorities are still under-diagnosed: ADHD and autism diagnoses are still lower in Black and Hispanic children compared to white children, despite similar or higher rates of symptoms, reflecting access disparities and diagnostic bias. Geographic variation is also striking: in April 2025, more than 8% of 8-year-olds in Texas were identified with autism, compared to over 5% in California; a difference likely driven by variation in screening access and resources, not actual prevalence.

Real cases are being missed because of skepticism: If widespread dismissal of diagnoses as “trendy” discourages parents from seeking professional assessment for their children, or if it pressures clinicians to be overly cautious, then genuine cases will go undiagnosed and people will miss out on interventions that could help.

What Proper Assessment Actually Looks Like

If you or someone you care about is concerned about ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression, or another condition, here is what a real diagnostic evaluation involves, not what you find on TikTok:

Initial Consultation

A clinician (psychiatrist, psychologist, clinical social worker, or specialized nurse practitioner) will conduct a detailed interview covering: current concerns, when they started, how they affect daily life, family history of similar conditions, medical history, medications, substance use, trauma or adverse experiences, school/work performance, and social relationships.

Standardized Assessments

Depending on the suspected condition, you may complete standardized rating scales (e.g., ADHD Rating Scale, Autism Spectrum Rating Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire for depression) that have been validated in research.

Collateral Information

For children and teens, clinicians gather input from parents, teachers, and sometimes coaches about behavior across different settings. For adults, school records, work evaluations, or family observations may be reviewed. This multi-source approach is crucial because you might behave or feel differently at home, work, or school.

Medical Workup

Depression, anxiety, ADHD, and other conditions can be caused or worsened by medical issues (thyroid problems, sleep disorders, anemia, neurological conditions) or medications. A thorough assessment includes medical history and sometimes lab work or referral to a physician.

Ruling Out Other Causes

Anxiety symptoms can reflect panic disorder, generalized anxiety, social anxiety, trauma, or normal stress. ADHD-like inattention can reflect depression, sleep deprivation, learning disabilities, or processing disorders. Autism can be confused with social anxiety, selective mutism, or developmental delay. A clinician systematically considers alternatives.

Discussion and Treatment Planning

Once assessment is complete, the clinician discusses findings, explains the diagnosis (if any), and works with you to develop a treatment plan, which might include therapy, medication, lifestyle changes, school/workplace accommodations, or referrals to specialists. You are a partner in this process, not a passive recipient of a label.

Key Statistics on Diagnostic Trends (2023–2025)

Here is what the latest data actually shows:

• Depression: U.S. prevalence increased from 8.2% (2013–2014) to 13.1% (2021–2023), a 60% jump. Among adolescents and adults with depression, 87.9% reported difficulty with work, home, and social activities.
• ADHD diagnosis rates: English prevalence rose from 8.2% (2007) to 13.9% (2023–24), though underlying symptom rates in boys remained stable and only slightly increased in girls.
• Autism diagnosis rates: Have risen 3–5 fold globally since the 1990s, but Swedish birth cohort data show this is not matched by proportional increases in parent-reported symptoms, suggesting diagnostic expansion.
• Youth mental health crises: ER visits for mental health reasons among adolescents/young adults nearly doubled from 2011 to 2020.
• Self-harm hospitalizations: Young women aged 10 – 24 have rates of 433 per 100,000 (2023 – 24), nearly 3 times higher than adult women.
• Comorbidity: About 70% of individuals with autism have at least one psychiatric comorbidity, and 40% have two or more, making diagnosis complex and prone to overlap.
• Social media misdiagnosis: People are 5 – 11 times more likely to incorrectly self-diagnose through social media than to correctly identify their condition.
• Geographic variation: Autism identification varies from over 8% in some Texas areas to over 5% in California (2025), reflecting access and diagnostic practice variation, not true prevalence differences.

How to Find Professional Assessment

If you suspect you or someone you care about has ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression, or another condition, professional assessment is the right step, not TikTok.

Who Can Diagnose?

Psychiatrists: Medical doctors specializing in mental health; can prescribe medication and conduct comprehensive evaluations.

Psychologists (PhD or PsyD): Licensed mental health professionals with doctoral training in assessment and diagnosis; cannot prescribe medication in most states (though some states allow it with additional training).

Clinical Social Workers (LCSW): Master’s-level clinicians trained in comprehensive assessment and therapy; cannot diagnose independently in most jurisdictions but often conduct assessments under psychiatric supervision.

Nurse Practitioners (NP) or Physician Assistants (PA): Some with specialization in psychiatry/behavioral health can conduct assessments and prescribe.

Where to Start

Ask your primary care doctor for a referral to a mental health professional. Check your insurance for in-network providers who specialize in the condition you are concerned about. If cost is a barrier, community mental health centers often offer sliding-scale or free assessments. University psychology clinics and some hospitals have assessment services. Avoid “online diagnosis” services without proper licensing verification.

Key Takeaway

The rise in mental health diagnoses reflects a complex mix of genuine increases in distress, diagnostic expansion, better recognition of historically missed groups, and yes, some degree of over-labeling of normal struggles. Social media self-diagnosis is a real and growing risk: people are far more likely to get it wrong than right, and a TikTok video cannot replace professional assessment. At the same time, dismissing all diagnoses as “trendy” risks leaving real people without help.

The path forward is nuanced: pursue professional assessment from trained clinicians who take time for comprehensive evaluation, be skeptical of TikTok and online quizzes, acknowledge that some conditions were under-diagnosed in the past, address the genuine societal stressors (social media impact, economic precarity, pandemic effects) driving real increases in distress, and ensure proper diagnosis results in tailored treatment not just a label.

Research References

All claims and statistics in this article are based on peer-reviewed research, clinical guidelines, and recent data analysis. Click links for primary sources:

1. PsyPost: Rising Autism and ADHD Diagnoses Not Matched by Symptom Increase (2025) – Swedish birth cohort study showing diagnostic expansion independent of symptom increases.
2. Moulder (2024): TikTok and Reliability of Self-Diagnosis – Research on positive correlations between perceived reliability and TikTok self-diagnosis.
3. Journal of Pediatrics (2024): Autism Spectrum Disorder – Overdiagnosis or Recognition? – Critical analysis of ASD prevalence, diagnostic criteria changes, and comorbidity complexity.
4. Moulder (2024): TikTok and Self-Diagnosing Mental Illness – Study on dangers of TikTok self-diagnosis, glamourization, and harm to those with clinical diagnoses.
5. British Medical Association: Mental Health Pressures Data (2025) – UK prevalence data showing depression rose from 17.6% (2007) to 22.6% (2023–24).
6. University of Liverpool (2025): Overdiagnosis vs. System Struggling for Care – Expert commentary on diagnostic trends and systemic factors.
7. New York Times (2022): Teens Turn to TikTok for Mental Health Diagnoses – Investigation into adolescent self-diagnosis trends.
8. CDC (2025): Depression Prevalence in Adolescents and Adults – U.S. data showing depression prevalence increase from 8.2% to 13.1% (2013–2023).
9. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (2025): ADHD Rates in Adults with Autism – Population-based study of 3.5 million adults showing ADHD/autism comorbidity and treatment outcomes.
10. Harvard Petrie-Flom Center (2025): Dr. TikTok – Impacts of Misinformation – Analysis showing 80% of mental health content can be misleading; 5–11x higher error rate in self-diagnosis.
11. Mind: The Big Mental Health Report 2025 (UK) – Comprehensive data on prevalence, service access, and youth mental health crisis.
12. BBC Future (2025): Why Autism Diagnoses Are on the Rise – Explanation of diagnostic criteria changes, awareness, and historical under-diagnosis.
13. Psychiatric Times (2023): TikTok’s Undiagnosis Trend – Alert on “undiagnosis” videos, glamourization, and harm to those with clinical diagnoses.

Note: All sources accessed January 2026. For professional diagnosis or treatment, consult a licensed mental health professional or physician.

Concerned About a Diagnosis? Get Professional Clarity

Still Mind Behavioral Mental Health provides comprehensive diagnostic assessment and evidence-based treatment. Our Fort Lauderdale team can help you navigate diagnostic concerns, rule out other causes, and develop a treatment plan based on professional evaluation.

Schedule Assessment: (561) 783-5507